INFLUENCE OF MENTORING AND ROLE MODELING IN PROMOTING SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL GIRLS ATTITUDES AND SELF–EFFICACY IN CHEMISTRY
ATTENTION:
BEFORE
YOU READ THE CHAPTER ONE OF THE PROJECT TOPIC BELOW, PLEASE READ THE
INFORMATION BELOW.THANK YOU!
INFORMATION:
YOU CAN
GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT OF THE TOPIC BELOW. THE FULL PROJECT COSTS N5,000
ONLY. THE FULL INFORMATION ON HOW TO PAY AND GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT IS AT THE
BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. OR YOU CAN CALL: 08068231953, 08168759420
INFLUENCE OF
MENTORING AND ROLE MODELING IN PROMOTING SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL GIRLS
ATTITUDES AND SELF–EFFICACY IN CHEMISTRY
ABSTRACT
This study
was carried out to identify senior secondary school girls’ mentors and role
models, determine the mentoring and role modeling qualities that could promote
girls interest and self efficacy in chemistry. Two hundred senior secondary
school girls were purposively chosen from two senior secondary schools from
Lagos educational district 1, Agege. Questionnaire was used to collect data and
data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Scientist (SPSS).
The results showed that senior secondary school girls mentors are their mothers
(N=103, 51.5%), there role model is also their mothers (N=65, 32.5%) closely
followed by medical doctors (N=47, 23.5%). Both represent more than half of the
total sample.
The findings
of the study also showed that self confidence of mentors can significantly
promote girls self efficacy in chemistry. Openness/objectivity of mentors and
optimism/hard working nature of role model significantly promote senior
secondary school girls interest and self efficacy in chemistry. Self confidence
of mentor was not a realistic measure of senior secondary school girls’
interest in chemistry. Moral behavior of role model cannot significantly
promote girls interest and self efficacy in chemistry.
CHAPTER ONE
1.1
INTRODUCTION
The role of
chemistry as a requirement for technological advancement of a nation cannot be
over emphasized and Nigeria is not an exception (Nbina J, 2012). Eke (2008) stated
that any nation aspiring to be scientifically and technological developed must
have adequate level of chemistry education. Based on this, the Federal
government through, her national policy on education, made chemistry a
compulsory science subject at the secondary level (NPE 2004). According to
Adesoji & Olatunbosun (2008) Chemistry is one of core science subjects at
the senior secondary level and plays significant role in unifying other science
subjects. This calls for the need to teach it effectively.
Thomas &
Tinu (2008) opined that the senior secondary school is to prepare student for
the future activities in the area of science and technology. At this level,
teaching ought to be activity oriented and centered on the student. Saage
(2009) reported that despite the increasing important of chemistry, the
performance of Nigerian students in the subject at secondary school remains
considerably poor. According to Betiku (2002), the available report from West
African Examination Council(WAEC) shows that student achievement in chemistry
worsen as years go by and many students seem to have negative attitude towards
the subject.
Farhana W
& Zainum M (2013) stated that many factors contributed to student success
and one of the factors is students’ attitude to learning. They opined that
understanding students’ attitude is essential in supporting students’
achievement and interest towards a particular subject .Papanastasious (2001)
reported that those who have positive attitude towards science perform better in
the subject. The teachers play an important role during the learning process
and they can directly or indirectly influence the student interest towards the
subject, which in consequence can influence student performance. Britner
&Pajares (2006) showed that self-efficacy is especially important in
learning difficult subjects, such as biology and other sciences, given that
students enter courses with varying levels of fear and anxiety. As concepts in
the course become increasingly complex, self-efficacy becomes a more important
variable that influences the potential for student learning. They demonstrated
that students’ self-efficacy is a strong predictor of their academic
performance. Poor academic performance of student in science subject is of
great concern to parents, educators, scholars and government. More worrisome is
the poor performance of female students. Orodho A (1996) reported that poor
performance in chemistry is attributed to several factors. These include
inappropriate syllabus, students’ poor attitudes towards the subject and
inadequate resources.
Bashir &
Kabir (2009) posited that gender difference in science, technology and
mathematics is characterized by under representation and under achievement in
these areas by female. Findings from studies on science education revealed that
female enrollment in science subjects are very low. Reporting National
Educational and development research council (NERDC, 1992) reveals that between
years 1987 and 1991 only about 40% of students that sat for the science
subjects of the final school certificate examination were female students.
Irowi (1991) noticed that the rate of female participation in school science
worldwide is lower than male participation.
Onekutu(2002)
wrote that achievement test results over the years have shown an ever
increasing gap between the performance of boys and girls in chemistry at senior
secondary school level. According to Eriba & Ande (2006), this has resulted
to a situation where there are more boys than girls doing chemistry at this
level i.e. boys dominated chemistry and science classes while the girls go into
reading languages and Arts. This perceived low achievement of girls in
chemistry is an unpleasant development which spells doom for those who would
have like to pursue careers in science programs in the universities.
Some factors
have been identified to be responsible for this and are discussed below:
1.1.1
Factors that negatively influence female participation and performance in
science and technology.
(a)
According to Bashir & Kabir (2009), women play numerous roles at home,
leading to the assumptions that women’s place is in the kitchen, which implies
that home duties and family responsibilities should be her sole priority. This
assumption negatively affects women active participation in national
development in general and scientific field in particular. As an individual,
educated woman scientists have numerous roles to play alongside their home
duties. She can be a professional science teacher, doctor, engineer, nurse,
mid-wife etc.
(b) Bashir
& Kabir (2009) stated that the assumptions that female are biologically not
designed for energy exerting and hazardous occupations also militates against
female participation in science and technology and mathematics. This argument
may not be true anymore because, with the age of information technology (IT),
intellectual ability counts more than physical energy.
(c)
Catherine W (2008) reported that, in many African countries, girls’ exclusion
from science can be attributed largely to the construction of feminine
identities, ideologies of domesticity and gender stereotypes. According to
UNESCO, “TIMSS 2011 Such gendered stereotypes are often ingrained early in life
and are difficult to overcome. There is a prevalent view in Nigeria that
women’s and men’s traditional roles in society should be preserved, and
therefore girls should not compete with boys in class. Those who do pursue
science can be stigmatized as aberrant or, at best, deemed “exceptional,”
whereas boys are presumed to have a “natural ability.
(d)
According to Bashir & Kabir (2009) the home contributes to female lack of
participation in science, technology and mathematics. At home, some parents
discourage their female children from entering for science subjects at
secondary school level. This attitudes exhibited undermines female confidence
and conveying strong messages that science and technical subjects are no go
areas. Some parents only educate male children at the expensed of female. In
the northern part of the country, education of majority of the female children
ends at post primary school level. They are married out at a very early age and
there education disrupted. The school portrays teacher bias which affects
females’ confidence and performance. Teachers’ different expectation for
females affects their achievement.
(e) Lastly,
Ekine, A(1999) asserted that with more
women accessing science education and careers, even if in small numbers, these
views are beginning to change. Nigerians are increasingly able to point to
female role models such as Grace Alele Williams, who was the first Nigerian
woman to obtain a doctorate, in mathematics education, and who then rose to
become the first female vice chancellor of the University of Benin.
Nonetheless, Nigerian women’s lack of visibility in the sciences, and the lack
of recognition that they can play a part in the sciences, at both the local and
national levels, persists. These different forms of cultural bias and
discrimination against girls in relation to their participation in science
greatly exacerbate their lack of self-confidence, which often translates into a
lack of interest and leads them to drop out of science classes. As girls get
older, they tend to become less confident in their abilities, even if
they are
performing at the same levels as their male peers, and thus they often show
science and
mathematics
related anxieties, and come to believe that science is not for them. Mentoring
and role modeling can be used as intervention strategies to encourage girls’
interest and self efficacy in chemistry, thereby improving their performance.
1.1.2
Mentoring in promoting girls attitude and self-efficacy in chemistry
According to
Mentorset (2014), mentoring is a powerful personal development and empowerment
tool. It is an effective way of helping people (students) to make progress in
their careers and is becoming increasingly popular as its potential is
realized. Mentoring is a partnership between two people (Mentor and Mentee)
normally working in a similar field or sharing similar experiences. It is a
relationship based upon mutual trust and respect. A mentor is a guide, who can
help the mentee to develop solutions to career issues. A mentor helps the
mentee (female students in this work) to believe in herself, boost her
confidence while providing guidance and encouragement. Mentors help keep
students in school, helps with homework and can improve their mentees’ academic
skills. A number of studies have revealed a correlation between a young
person’s involvement in a quality mentoring relationship and positive outcomes
in the areas of school, mental health, problem behavior and health. Also, Marshall
(2001), define mentoring as a process of people helping people; where helping
teaching, advising counseling, instructing and guidance are provided by one
person to another. He suggested that mentoring increases networking and social
interaction. Lough( 2001),describes mentoring as a process that links an
experienced individual with someone who needs support and guidance. Abbey
(1991) proposed that mentoring schemes as a mechanism for developing females’
careers and providing a genuine opportunity to become significant leaders in
sport. Bauldry & Hartman (2004) reported that mentoring programs have
achieved extensive public recognition due to their remarkable success in
increasing positive behaviors in youth and reducing negative behaviors.
According to Jekielek, Moore and Hair (2002), youth participation in mentoring
relationships improved important educational measures such as unexcused
absences and better attitudes. They noted that mentoring also helped develop
healthier behaviors (less drug and alcohol use) and improved social and
behavioral outcomes, such as better relationship with parents and peers. Wood
and Mayo-Wilson (2012) in their meta-analysis of school based mentoring
programs for adolescents similarly found small to modest positive changes in
student attendance. Wheeler, Keller, Dubois (2010), Funk and Ek (2002) and
Jekielek et al. (2002) also reported reductions in truancy in their studies.
1.1.3
Qualities of a mentor
According to
Daloz, 1999 & Guy, 2002. A mentor was described as an older, more
experienced person who shared his or her expertise and knowledge with a mentee.
As mentoring research progressed, age differential between mentor and mentee
was found increasingly irrelevant. Knowledge, skill, expertise, and experience
of the mentor were considered more essential than age differential. The mentor
must also be knowledgeable, experienced, interested, accessible, and a
networker. This individual must be willing to share resources, observe
confidentiality, show mutual respect, and show affection (Carruthers, 1993;
English, 1996). In a qualitative study of 27 mentors from 5 medium to large
companies, Allen and Poteet (1999) found characteristics of an ideal mentor.
Among these were listening and communication skills, patience, knowledge of the
organization, the ability to understand others, honesty, a genuine interest in
mentoring, people-orientation, structure, vision, common sense,
self-confidence, openness to suggestions, leadership qualities, versatility,
respect of others, an ability to teach, willingness to give feedback, and
fairness/objectivity. The mentor has an outlook which is both positive and
realistic, is prepared to give quality time to others, will listen and not
pre-judge, retains an interest in their own growth and development, has a
degree of self-assurance which enables them to be challenged and receive
criticism (and to give it), and is prepared for occasional feelings of
discomfort (Whitaker & Cartwright, 2000). In addition, the mentor displays
an ability to readily see potential in a person; tolerance with mistakes,
brashness, abrasiveness, and the like, in order to see that potential develop;
flexibility in responding to people and circumstances; patience; perspective;
and gifts and abilities that build up and encourage others (Stanley &
Clinton, 1992). The mentor is also a person of integrity, judgment, wisdom,
self-knowledge (Garvey, Alfred, & Smith, 1996), and a high tolerance for
complexity with the ability to help the mentee navigate it (Garvey & Alred,
2001). A unique perspective on mentor function held that social judgment
capacities were essential, including wisdom, social perceptiveness, and moral
and social reasoning (Sosik & Lee, 2002). MacCallum & Beltman (2002)
noted that mentors need to be caring and have a positive non judgmental
approach to young people and guide them in their journey. According to Mc Kimm
et al. (2003), the following are qualities that characterize good mentors: good
interpersonal skills, objectivity, role model, flexibility peer respect, demonstrable
competence, reflective practitioner, non-threatening, attitude facilitator of
learning, allowing the development of initiative and independence, open
mindedness, approachability, self-confidence and self awareness advocacy,
sincerity, warmth, commitment, understanding etc.
Heeralal P
(2014) carried out a study on student teachers’ perspective of qualities of
good mentor teachers. The result of the study is presented in table A. The data
suggests that student teachers would like their mentors to be knowledgeable,
experienced, honest, respectful, fair, flexible and understanding, Student
teachers do not like to have mentors that are controlling and strict
Table1.1:
Students preferences of qualities of mentor teachers
Qualities
Percentage
of students preferring this quality
Knowledgeable
94.9
Experienced
84.7
Honest
84.6
Respectful
92.3
Fair
84.6
Understanding
89.7
Strict
30.8
Controlling
25.6
1.1.4 Role
modeling in promoting girls attitude and self-efficacy in chemistry
According to
Kenny, Mann & Macheod, (2003), role modeling is described as teaching by
example and influencing people in an often times unintentional, unaware,
informal and episodic manner. That is, everyone serves as role model for
learners in our field through our routine actions. It has been referred to as
the “hidden curriculum” of professional education as one often lack
understanding regarding the influence role modeling has on learners. Students
learn behaviors that appears successful to them in the light of their personal
goals and rewards. This is a foundational principle of social learning theory
and how role models exert influence on others.
According to
Lockwood & Kunda ( 1997), a role model can be a symbolic entity, an
inspirational and/or motivational individual, someone from whom one can learn
and model desired behaviors. Role modeling according to Dake and Taylor
(1994) is teaching by example and
learning by imitation.
Asghani
& Atabaki (2011) found that role models not only help students develop
their knowledge and skill, but also play significant role in shaping and
inspiring a career. According to Teach.com (2014), a role model inspires and
encourages us to strive for greatness, live to our full potential and see the
best in ourselves. Students learn through role models, through their commitment
to excellence and ability to make students realize their own personal growth. A
role model can be anybody, a parent, a friend, a sibling but some of the most
influential and life changing role models are teachers. Therefore, teachers can
use this tool to promote girls interest in chemistry, which will subsequently
improve their academic performance.
1.1.5
Qualities of a role model
According to
Freddie (2014), role models inspire youngsters to reach their full potentials.
He stated that not everyone is suitable to be influential, positive role model.
Effective role models possess desirable characteristics that make them easy to
look up to. These qualities are:
1.1.5.1
Moral: A good role model has high moral values. Research conducted by
developmental psychologist Marilyn Price-Mitchell and reported on her website,
Root of Action; found that children respect those who practice what they
preach. Role models behave ethically and demonstrate honesty.
1.1.5.2
Confident: People admire those who project confidence. Good role models, have a
healthy appreciation of their accomplishments. They are able to acknowledge
their skills and achievement without becoming arrogant.
1.1.5.3
Hardworking: Role models demonstrate their commitment to a desired goal and are
willing to invest the necessary time and effort to achieve success. They don’t
give up easily and they persevere when confronted by obstacles. Their passion
to succeed inspires youngsters to follow through and reach the goals they set
for themselves.
1.1.5.4
Respect: For role model to be influential, they must show respect for others.
Young people appreciate being treated with respect and admire those who treat
them and others that way. Role model who demonstrate selflessness and a
democratic, non-prejudiced view of those different from themselves earn the
admiration of others.
1.1.5.5
Optimistic and Creative: Role models inspire others with an upbeat, optimistic
outlook to life. No one would want to emulate a pessimistic individual.
Marty Z
(2010) highlighted seven traits of a role model to be: confidence &
leadership, uniqueness, good communication, respect, knowledgeable, humility
and doing good things outside their jobs. Sharlyn L (2013): stated six
qualities of a role model; awareness, commitment, empathy, foresight, listening
and persuasion.
1.2
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
This study
will provide science educators, curriculum planners, government and the wider
society with detailed information about mentoring and role modeling qualities
that can effectively promote girls’ attitude and self efficacy in chemistry
thereby, improving their academic performance. In view of this information,
curriculum planner and government can ensure that these tools are incorporated
into planning and formation of policies for science education.
1.3
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
The
theoretical background of this study is the social learning theory. According
to Albert Bandura(1977). Social learning theory is a learning theory based on
the ideas that people learn by watching what others do and that human thought
process are central to understanding personality. This provides a framework for
understanding, predicting and changing human behavior. The main tenets of
Bandura’s theory are that:
(i) People
learn by observing others.
(ii) The
same set of stimuli may provoke different responses from different people or
from the same people at different times.
(iii) The
world and a person’s behavior are intertwined.
(iv)
Personality is an interaction between three factors: the environment, behavior
and a person’s psychological processes.
Through his
research, Bandura (1977) established that there are certain steps involved in
the modeling process:
(i)
Attention: one need to pay attention to learn something new. The more striking
or different something is, the more likely it is to gain our attention.
(ii) Retention:
one must be able to retain (remember) what one has paid attention to. One store
what one has seen the model doing in the form of verbal descriptions or mental
images and bring. These triggers up later to help one reproduce the model with
one own behavior.
(iii)
Reproduction: at this point, one has to translate the images or description
into actual behavior. One must have the ability to reproduce the behavior in
the first place.
(iv)
Motivation: Unless one is motivated, or have a reason, one will not try to
imitate the model. Badura (1977) states a number of motives including: past
reinforcement, promised reinforcement and vicarious reinforcement.
According to
Kendra (2014), the concept of self-efficacy is central to Albert Bandura’s
social cognitive theory which emphasizes the role of observational learning,
social experience and reciprocal determinism in the development of personality.
According to Bandura, a person’s attitudes, abilities and cognitive skills
comprise what is known as the self-system. This system plays a major role in
how one perceives situations and how one behaves in response to different
situations. Bandura (1995) defines self-efficacy as “the belief in one’s
capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to manage
prospective situations” that is, self-efficacy is a person’s belief in his/her
ability to succeed in a particular situation. He described these beliefs as
determinants of how people think, behave and feel. Bandura found that an
individual self-efficacy plays a major role in how goals, tasks and challenges
are approached.
Based on
these theories, this research assumes that a student with a strong/positive
self-efficacy and attitudes tends to put greater effort into studying
(chemistry), which eventually results in good performance. Those with
weak/negative self efficacy and attitudes are less likely to put great effort
into the subject which eventually results in low/poor achievement/performance
1.4
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
Many
researchers have carried out studies about under-achievement of females in the
sciences (Eriba & Ande, 2006). Adesoji (2008) stated that there is a
relationship between attitude and achievement and that it is possible to
predict achievement from attitude scores. Turner et al (2009) also agree that
self efficacy is strongly related to one’s academic achievement. Research has
shown that youth in mentoring relationship present better attitudes and
behaviors at school ( Jekielek et al, 2002) and that mentoring helps improve a
young person’s self esteem, set career goals and start taking steps to realize
them ( mentor set, 2014).
Asghari et
al (2011) examined opinion of fourth year medical students on role modeling and
reported that role models are not only important in helping students develop
their knowledge and skill but 57 percent of the students claimed their role
model influenced their decision regarding their clinical specialty for
residency training.
Some authors
and investigator are skeptical about mentoring and disagree with the idea that
mentoring is always a positive experience. Also, according to Ashley J (2014),
a role model could have negative impact on learners. This study therefore
examines if mentoring and role modeling could be used as intervention
strategies to promote senior secondary school attitude and self efficacy in
chemistry.
1.5 Purpose
of study
The purpose
of study is to:
(1) Identify
senior secondary school girls’ mentors and role models.
(2) Identify
the mentoring qualities that could promote girls attitudes and self – efficacy
in chemistry.
(3)
Determine the role modeling qualities that could promote girls attitudes and
self efficacy in chemistry.
1.6 Research
Questions
(1) Who are
the senior secondary school girls’ mentors and role models?
(2) How will
self confidence of mentors promote girls’ attitudes and self-efficacy in
chemistry?
(3) To what
extent will openness of mentors promotes girls’ attitudes and self-efficacy in
chemistry?
(4) How will
objectivity of mentors promote girls’ attitudes and self-efficacy in chemistry?
(5) To what
extent will hardworking nature of role models promote girls attitudes and
self-efficacy in chemistry?
(6) How will
optimism of role models promote girls’ attitudes and self-efficacy in
chemistry?
(7) To what
extent will moral behaviors of role models promote girls attitudes and
self-efficacy in chemistry?
1.7
Definition of terms
Attitude
towards chemistry: refers to students’ interest in chemistry.
Mentoring:
Is a way of helping students to make progress in their academic work
(chemistry) and careers.
Role
modeling: Is teaching by example and influencing people.
Self –
efficacy in chemistry: indicates students self belief in learning chemistry and
achievement.
HOW TO GET THE FULL PROJECT WORK
PLEASE, print the following
instructions and information if you will like to order/buy our complete written
material(s).
HOW TO RECEIVE PROJECT MATERIAL(S)
After paying the appropriate amount
(#5,000) into our bank Account below, send the following information to
08068231953 or 08168759420
(1) Your project
topics
(2) Email
Address
(3) Payment
Name
(4) Teller Number
We will send your material(s) after
we receive bank alert
BANK ACCOUNTS
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 0046579864
Bank: GTBank.
OR
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 2023350498
Bank: UBA.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL:
08068231953 or 08168759420
AFFILIATE
Comments
Post a Comment